Can you run the same test on one of their FreeBSD boxes to confirm
	it is stage 3 and everything else is identical - no extra
	arguments to ps2epsi or different versions of Word?

                David/absolute
			       -- www.netbsd.org: A pmap for every occasion --


On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Steven Grunza wrote:

> This is possibly not the correct place to ask this question but our IT
> guys here use FreeBSD and it just works:
> 
> 
> I would like to use NetBSD-i386 to convert a PostScript document to an
> Encapsulated PostScript document with an embedded image.  The EPS file
> would then be used in Word97.  On screen it would have a visible
> bit-map, on the printer it would be a PostScript output.  Since the
> image is scaled, it really needs to be PostScript when printed.
> 
> I've tried:
> 
> 1)  using the Print to Disk option with a standard Windows Postscript
> driver to create the original file, moved it to where my NetBSD machine
> can get to it, and called it portrait.ps.
> 
> 2)  gs portrait.ps
> :displays the file without problems.
> 
> 3)  ps2epsi portrait.ps portrait.eps
> :doesn't report any errors
> 
> I then move the file back to where Windows can grab it, import it into
> Word97, and get the "No embedded image" comment in the on-screen
> version.  It does print ok to the Postscript printer.
> 
> Is this a problem with Word or with my setup of Ghostscript?  The
> FreeBSD guys report it to "just work" with their setup and don't want to
> figure out what's wrong with my setup.
> 
> I installed ghostscript from /usr/pkgsrc/print/ghostscript by doing a
> "make" followed by a "make install".  The pkg_info command reports
> (among other things):
> 
> ghostscript-5.50    Aladdin Postscript interpreter
> 
> Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions on how to make this work?