Subject: Re: kernel.
To: Reinoud Koornstra <Reinoud.Koornstra@ibbnet.org>
From: David Brownlee <abs@mono.org>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 10/19/1999 21:29:35
The inverse - a micro kernel involves extra overhead when passing
messages between the kernel and modules. There are advantages to
a micro kernel approach, but in general performance is not one of
them.
David/absolute
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> So you say that micro kernels are better when it comes to performance?
>
> Bye,
>
> Reinoud.
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> > I think you may be referring to the "hurd", though as it happens
> > a significant performance "hurt" does tend to come with the use
> > of micro kernels vs monolithic kernels used in traditional unix
> > systems.