Subject: Re: Disjoint ethernet segment routing problems
To: Paul Newhouse <newhouse@rockhead.com>
From: Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 04/11/1999 14:21:42
Paul Newhouse wrote:
...
>    inet 205.219.89.45 netmask 255.255.255.248 broadcast 205.219.89.47
...
> I can't get to any address on the DSL link beyond .46.
...

Just a thought: 255.255.255.248 gets you
205.219.89.40 (all zeros) to
205.219.89.47 (all ones)

so it sort of makes sense if all zeros and all ones are reserved, though
I didn't follow the which subnet is where part...

Cheers,

Patrick