Subject: Re: Scanner software?
To: Julian Coleman <J.D.Coleman@newcastle.ac.uk>
From: David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 04/18/1998 14:42:47
SANE certainly looks to be the way to go. Might it be possible to
produce a NetBSD package for SANE to make it easier for anyone
to install?
http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/netbsd/Packages.txt
David/absolute
-=- Just adding to the wrinkles on his deathly frown -=-
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Julian Coleman wrote:
> Feico Dillema wrote:
> > PINT has been part of NetBSD since 1.2 (I think). However, I don't think
> > support for the Umax scanners is in there, only scanjet/mustek support. Some
> > time ago I added support for some Ricoh scanners to it.
>
> I started using PiNT with an HP scanner attached to a Sparc. It worked well,
> although the user-interface isn't wonderful (I did write a curses-based
> front-end but ...). I stopped using PiNT when I moved to 1.3 because it
> locks up the (Sparc) kernel on bootup. I'm trying to track this down.
>
> > I don't know whether the `raw-scsi' backends of SANE will work with NetBSD
> > (maybe with the scsi-lib???) without modification, but SANE is a valuable
> > source of information wrt to scanners. You can find it on the Web at:
>
> Yes, they will. I'm using Sane 0.70 with no problems - no patches needed.
> I haven't tried the latest version yet (0.72) and I've only tried it with
> an HP scanner on a Sparc.
>
> > I've been hesitating with this, as I don't know how much of a standard PINT
> > is and whether its development is actually dead. The effort would be wasted
> > if it would result in incompatible PINT versions floating around. Please
> > comment.
>
> As far as I can see, PiNT has stopped being developed (please correct me if
> I'm wrong). I don't see this as a reason why your Ricoh support couldn't be
> added though. Maybe it would spur other people to fix/extend PiNT. However,
> is it worth continuing to push PiNT if SANE is available? Then again, I'm
> not sure how many people have scanners attached to their NetBSD machines -
> only a handful I'd guess - not that that really matters I suppose.
>
> J
>
> --
> 1024/55A5BC19 0F 3F 62 56 18 10 8B 84 43 8F F4 94 93 37 76 AA
>
> S.E.P.
>