At Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:09:44 +0100,
Rui Paulo wrote:
> 
> At Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:02:48 +0200,
> Klaus Heinz wrote:
> > 
> > Rui Paulo wrote:
> > 
> > > What about using NETBSDSRCDIR or BSDSRCDIR instead of CURRENTSRCDIR.htdocs ?
> > > The rest looks pretty reasonable.
> > 
> > I already described my reason for that:
> > 
> > > > I did not use NETBSDSRCDIR (from bsd.own.mk) because this may not be
> > > > a src tree for -current. On my machine it contains netbsd-3.
> 
> Sorry, my mistake.
> I don't have objections on this, please go ahead if no one objects.

Actually, what about:

<![ %sgml.includes; [
    <screen><inlinemediaobject><imageobject><imagedata
            fileref="ROADMAP"
            format="linespecific"></imagedata></imageobject></inlinemediaobject>
    </screen>
]]>
<![ %xml.includes; [
    <screen><xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
        href="ROADMAP" parse="text" /></screen>
]]>     

like chap-pam.xml does ?