Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org> writes:

> Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net> wrote:
>> Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org> writes:
>> 
>> > Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net> wrote:
>> >  
>> >> Then, convince admins to build the website on nbwww.
>> >
>> > There is no fundamental opposition to build htdocs on nbwww.  There is
>> > opposition to (a) install X on nbwww and (b) build htdocs _as is_ on
>> > nbwww due to load contraints.[1]
>> >
>> > Both (a) and (b) are very understandable.
>> 
>> Yes, but I _never_ said that.
>
> Said what? :-)
>
> You said:
>
>> >> Then, convince admins to build the website on nbwww.
>
> Which sounds like there was some opposition to building htdocs on nbwww,
> which I just wanted to clarify.

That was a reply to Hubert and before that I mentioned the reasons why
we/admins don't want to use nbwww to build htdocs.

-- 
Rui Paulo - rpaulo@fnop.net