Subject: Re: htdocs/Ports/history.html ==> htdocs/Ports/index.xml
To: None <netbsd-docs@NetBSD.org>
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@netbsd-pt.org>
List: netbsd-docs
Date: 06/02/2005 00:06:17
On 2005.06.02 00:50:17 +0000, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> >On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> >>>Anyone with plans to Ports/history.html, or can we remove it after it's
> >>>inclusion in Ports/index.xml ?
> >>
> >>I do not think we need it anymore.
> 
> While reviewing Rui's patch again, I see that there's a duplication of 
> dates of NetBSD releases here now between htdocs/Ports/index.xml and 
> htdocs/Releases/formal.xml. I think it's nice to see what ports 
> were included in which release first at a glance, but that's still 
> redundant information. Shall we leave it that way, or maybe someone has a 
> better idea?

Ports/index.xml only has dates for major releases as in a minor release
no Ports are added. I don't think it hurts a lot to have the dates for
major releases, but we can remove that too and leave only the dates of
inclusions of the Ports.

What do you think ?

-- 
Rui Paulo <rpaulo@netbsd-pt.org>