Re: lib/58282: Sysinst terminal output size increased because curses

["Brett Lymn via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR lib/58282; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Brett Lymn <blymn%internode.on.net@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: blymn%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
        Andreas Gustafsson <gson%gson.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: lib/58282: Sysinst terminal output size increased because curses
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 14:15:58 +0930

 On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 05:15:01AM +0000, Brett Lymn via gnats wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR lib/58282; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Brett Lymn <blymn%internode.on.net@localhost>
 > To: Andreas Gustafsson <gson%gson.org@localhost>
 > Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: lib/58282: Sysinst terminal output size increased because curses
 > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 14:44:44 +0930
 > 
 >  On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 07:31:12AM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
 >  > 
 >  > I don't see the reversion on cvs.netbsd.org yet.
 >  >
 >  
 >  Thanks to kre for sorting this.  I thought I had done it but cvs was
 >  complaining about a sticky flag.
 >  
 
 OK, I have committed the update again now.  There was a problem in
 quickch() that caused it to loop infinitely.  I have cleaned up
 quickch() to remove a lot of historical changes that were done as
 incidental work arounds for the broken hashes.  I tested sysinst and it
 works fine now as does vi.
 
 I am still deeply suspicious of quickch(), I don't believe that it
 always does the correct thing as I can see what I consider to be
 spurious scrolling regions being set in some of the tests but in other
 tests the outputs are well optimised - e.g. the scroll test does the
 right thing in setting a scrop region instead of rewriting the whole
 screen on a single line scroll.
 
 All atf tests pass with this update now.
 
 -- 
 Brett Lymn
 --
 Sent from my NetBSD device.
 
 "We are were wolves",
 "You mean werewolves?",
 "No we were wolves, now we are something else entirely",
 "Oh"