NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
port-arm/60210: /usr/sbin/named doesn't work on NetBSD-11/earmv5, earmv6hf, earmv7hf
>Number: 60210
>Category: port-arm
>Synopsis: /usr/sbin/named doesn't work on NetBSD-11/earmv5, earmv6hf, earmv7hf
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: port-arm-maintainer
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Sun Apr 26 01:45:00 +0000 2026
>Originator: John Klos
>Release: NetBSD 11.0_RC3
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD nano.zia.io 11.0_RC3 NetBSD 11.0_RC3 (GENERIC) #0: Mon Apr 13 07:56:14 UTC 2026 john%platypus.zia.io@localhost:/usr/obj-evbarm/sys/arch/evbarm/compile/GENERIC evbarm
Architecture: earmv7hf
Machine: evbarm
>Description:
Launching /usr/sbin/named with any configuration gives a process that
takes 100% CPU on one core.
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
4014 root 26 0 74M 11M CPU/3 4:56 99.02% 99.02% named
(gdb) where
#0 0x77dc3940 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
#1 0x7851bce4 in poll () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
#2 0x001cee04 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb) list
1483 scf_handle_destroy(h);
1484 return (ISC_R_FAILURE);
1485 }
1486
1487 if ((instance = isc_mem_allocate(mctx, namelen + 1)) == NULL) {
1488 UNEXPECTED_ERROR("named_smf_get_instance memory "
1489 "allocation failed: %s",
1490 isc_result_totext(ISC_R_NOMEMORY));
1491 scf_handle_destroy(h);
1492 return (ISC_R_FAILURE);
>How-To-Repeat:
Try to run /usr/sbin/named on 32 bit Arm.
>Fix:
>Unformatted:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index