NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

port-arm/60210: /usr/sbin/named doesn't work on NetBSD-11/earmv5, earmv6hf, earmv7hf



>Number:         60210
>Category:       port-arm
>Synopsis:       /usr/sbin/named doesn't work on NetBSD-11/earmv5, earmv6hf, earmv7hf
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    port-arm-maintainer
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Apr 26 01:45:00 +0000 2026
>Originator:     John Klos
>Release:        NetBSD 11.0_RC3
>Organization:
	
>Environment:
	
	
System: NetBSD nano.zia.io 11.0_RC3 NetBSD 11.0_RC3 (GENERIC) #0: Mon Apr 13 07:56:14 UTC 2026 john%platypus.zia.io@localhost:/usr/obj-evbarm/sys/arch/evbarm/compile/GENERIC evbarm
Architecture: earmv7hf
Machine: evbarm
>Description:
	
Launching /usr/sbin/named with any configuration gives a process that 
takes 100% CPU on one core.

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE   SIZE   RES STATE       TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
 4014 root      26    0    74M   11M CPU/3       4:56 99.02% 99.02% named

(gdb) where
#0  0x77dc3940 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
#1  0x7851bce4 in poll () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
#2  0x001cee04 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb) list
1483			scf_handle_destroy(h);
1484			return (ISC_R_FAILURE);
1485		}
1486	
1487		if ((instance = isc_mem_allocate(mctx, namelen + 1)) == NULL) {
1488			UNEXPECTED_ERROR("named_smf_get_instance memory "
1489					 "allocation failed: %s",
1490					 isc_result_totext(ISC_R_NOMEMORY));
1491			scf_handle_destroy(h);
1492			return (ISC_R_FAILURE);


>How-To-Repeat:
	
Try to run /usr/sbin/named on 32 bit Arm.
>Fix:
	

>Unformatted:
 	
 	



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index