Re: port-arm/57139

["Nick Hudson via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-arm/57139; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nick Hudson <nick.hudson%gmx.co.uk@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, port-arm-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, cryintothebluesky%gmail.com@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-arm/57139
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 08:46:47 +0000

 On 09/12/2025 08:35, Sad Clouds via gnats wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR port-arm/57139; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Sad Clouds <cryintothebluesky%gmail.com@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: port-arm/57139
 > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 08:33:31 +0000
 >
 >   I wonder if there is a difference in behavior depending on whether
 >   NetBSD kernel is booting via UEFI or some other bootloader.
 
 absolutely. This is why I asked for full dmesg.