NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-i386/59584: bge0 fails load properly at boot



The following reply was made to PR port-i386/59584; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christophe =?UTF-8?B?UHLDqXZvdGF1eA==?= <cp%rural-networks.com@localhost>
To: "Michael van Elst via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, port-i386-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
 netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-i386/59584: bge0 fails load properly at boot
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 02:46:11 +0900

 On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 17:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
 "Michael van Elst via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost> shaped the electrons =
 to
 say:
 
 > The following reply was made to PR port-i386/59584; it has been noted by
 > GNATS.
 >=20
 > From: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc:=20
 > Subject: Re: port-i386/59584: bge0 fails load properly at boot
 > Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 17:25:21 -0000 (UTC)
 >=20
 >  cp%rural-networks.com@localhost writes:
 > =20
 >  ># pcictl pci0 dump -b 4 -d 0 -f 0
 >  >PCI configuration registers:
 >  >  Common header:
 >  >    0x00: 0x169d14e4 0x00100006 0x02000021 0x00000010
 > =20
 >  >    Vendor Name: Broadcom (0x14e4)
 >  >    Device Name: BCM5789 NetLink 1000baseT Ethernet (0x169d)
 >  [...]
 > =20
 >  >  Type 0 ("normal" device) header:
 >  >    0x10: 0x00000004 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
 >  >    0x20: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000007 0x00941025
 >  >    0x30: 0x00000000 0x00000048 0x00000000 0x0000010a
 > =20
 >  >    Base address register at 0x10
 >  >      type: 64-bit nonprefetchable memory
 >  >      base: 0x0000000000000000
 > =20
 > =20
 >  BIOS/ACPI didn't configure a base address.
 > =20
 >  Maybe there is a BIOS setting changing this, like Option Prom enable
 >  or disable devices above 4GB.
 > =20
 >  It's also possible that you need 64bit addressing and a PAE kernel
 >  to access the interface.
 > =20
 > =20
 
 
 There is no such option in BIOS of this machine, but if such a case if poss=
 ible
 why is the kernel not PAE by default ?=20
 
 --=20
 --=20
 Christophe Pr=C3=A9votaux
 =E3=82=AF=E3=83=AA=E3=82=B9=E3=83=88=E3=83=95=E3=80=80=E3=83=97=E3=83=AC=E3=
 =83=9C=E3=83=88
 Email : cp%rural-networks.com@localhost
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index