On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 01:57:15PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 05:51:05PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:51:26AM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> > > Can you try the attached patch?
> > >
> > > And, can you record some dtrace output to see where this busy-wait
> > > logic takes effect?
> > >
> > > dtrace -n '
> > > sdt:::pool_grow* { @[probename, stack()] = count() }
> > > tick-10s { printa(@) }
> > > '
> >
> > I attached the dtrace output after running for about an hour.
>
> here's another trace, now thaty the server has reached its steady state,
> with most of the RAM being used for file and inode caches.
with the file attached
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Attachment:
dtrace-2.o.xz
Description: application/xz