Re: port-alpha/57511: ld.elf_so(1) does not support secure PLT for alpha

["Rin Okuyama via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-alpha/57511; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Rin Okuyama <rokuyama.rk%gmail.com@localhost>
To: Taylor R Campbell <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost>, Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-alpha/57511: ld.elf_so(1) does not support secure PLT for
 alpha
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 15:23:52 +0900

 On 2025/04/19 3:20, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
 >> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:00:17 -0700
 >> From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
 >>
 >> Looks good to me.  I do have concerns about the performance
 >> implications of large programs that end up with multiple GOTs, but
 >> that's an issue with the format, not with the change itself.
 > 
 > Thanks!  I split it up into two commits to make it easier to pull them
 > up separately if we want: one to add support to ld.elf_so, the other
 > to remove our local hack disabling secureplt by default in binutils
 > (and we could always put -Wl,--no-secureplt in bsd.*.mk in a third
 > commit, of course).
 > 
 > How is the multiple-GOT issue different from other architectures?
 
 Thanks for your works!!
 
 -current as of yesterday works just fine on my AlphaStation DS10:
 no regression for full ATF run, and some pkgsrc's successfully build.
 
 rin