Re: port-alpha/57511: ld.elf_so(1) does not support secure PLT for alpha

["Taylor R Campbell via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-alpha/57511; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Taylor R Campbell <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Cc: Rin Okuyama <rokuyama.rk%gmail.com@localhost>,
	Jason Thorpe <thorpej%NetBSD.org@localhost>,
	gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-alpha/57511: ld.elf_so(1) does not support secure PLT for
	alpha
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 18:20:18 +0000

 > Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:00:17 -0700
 > From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
 > 
 > Looks good to me.  I do have concerns about the performance
 > implications of large programs that end up with multiple GOTs, but
 > that's an issue with the format, not with the change itself.
 
 Thanks!  I split it up into two commits to make it easier to pull them
 up separately if we want: one to add support to ld.elf_so, the other
 to remove our local hack disabling secureplt by default in binutils
 (and we could always put -Wl,--no-secureplt in bsd.*.mk in a third
 commit, of course).
 
 How is the multiple-GOT issue different from other architectures?