Re: kern/58916: timerfd(2) claims ready for write

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>]

> On Dec 18, 2024, at 6:39 PM, Taylor R Campbell <campbell%mumble.net@localhost> wrote:
> 
> (This came up in Python's automatic tests of select on timerfds,
> details in <https://gnats.netbsd.org/58914>.  Happy to revert the
> change.  Mainly I just want to make sure these timer- and timerfd-
> related paths are adequately exercised with clear automatic tests that
> cover enough to avoid gratuitous application incompatibility and
> kernel crashes.)

In this case, I think it’s better to file a bug against the Python test suite.

-- thorpej