PR/57881 CVS commit: [netbsd-10] src

["Martin Husemann" <martin%netbsd.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-vax/57881; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Martin Husemann" <martin%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%gnats.NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: PR/57881 CVS commit: [netbsd-10] src
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:05:18 +0000

 Module Name:	src
 Committed By:	martin
 Date:		Sun Oct 13 15:05:18 UTC 2024
 
 Modified Files:
 	src/distrib/sets/lists/debug [netbsd-10]: mi
 	src/distrib/sets/lists/tests [netbsd-10]: mi
 	src/lib/libm/src [netbsd-10]: s_nexttoward.c
 	src/tests/lib/libm [netbsd-10]: Makefile
 Added Files:
 	src/tests/lib/libm [netbsd-10]: t_next.c
 
 Log Message:
 Pull up following revision(s) (requested by riastradh in ticket #963):
 
 	tests/lib/libm/Makefile: revision 1.49
 	distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi: revision 1.1315
 	tests/lib/libm/t_next.c: revision 1.1
 	tests/lib/libm/t_next.c: revision 1.2
 	distrib/sets/lists/debug/mi: revision 1.435
 	tests/lib/libm/t_next.c: revision 1.3
 	tests/lib/libm/t_next.c: revision 1.4
 	tests/lib/libm/t_next.c: revision 1.5
 	tests/lib/libm/t_next.c: revision 1.6
 	lib/libm/src/s_nexttoward.c: revision 1.3
 
 tests/lib/libm: Test nextafter/nexttoward and variants.
 
 The tests are fairly trivial but should work without any conditionals
 about floating-point formats.
 tests/lib/libm/t_next: Disable this test on VAX.
 
 But leave a replacement xfail test that fails unconditionally, to
 leave a reminder in the tests of PR 57881: vax libm is missing
 various symbols.
 
 tests/lib/libm/t_next: Fix stub on VAX.
 Tested building the wrong tree, oops.
 
 tests/lib/libm/t_next: Expand substantially.
 
 This covers many more potential problem areas -- and includes a new
 xfail test for PR lib/58236: nexttoward(3) is broken on subnormals.
 tests/lib/libm/t_next: nexttoward works if it's just nextafter.
 
 It's broken on platforms where long double and double aren't the same
 and nexttoward isn't an alias for nextafter.
 nexttoward(3): Fix high-word test on small positive subnormals.
 
 By this point in the logic, x can't be zero, so it's either positive
 or negative.
 
 The high word hx, however, can be zero, when x is a small positive
 subnormal.  This means x is a small positive subnormal, so if x > y
 we are computing nextDown, and if x < y we are computing nextUp.
 hx is a (signed 32-bit) integer, not a double floating-point number,
 so it's a little silly to compare hx > 0.0.  But that on its own
 isn't enough to trigger the bug because all signed 32-bit integers
 can be represented by double on all NetBSD architectures.
 PR lib/58236
 
 
 To generate a diff of this commit:
 cvs rdiff -u -r1.394.2.12 -r1.394.2.13 src/distrib/sets/lists/debug/mi
 cvs rdiff -u -r1.1238.2.14 -r1.1238.2.15 src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi
 cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r1.2.36.1 src/lib/libm/src/s_nexttoward.c
 cvs rdiff -u -r1.48.2.2 -r1.48.2.3 src/tests/lib/libm/Makefile
 cvs rdiff -u -r0 -r1.7.4.2 src/tests/lib/libm/t_next.c
 
 Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
 copyright notices on the relevant files.