Re: kern/58531 (NetBSD 10.0 deadlock in nd_timer)

To: kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,rin%NetBSD.org@localhost,manu%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/58531 (NetBSD 10.0 deadlock in nd_timer)
From: rin%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 14:49:26 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: NetBSD 10.0 deadlock in nd_timer

State-Changed-From-To: needs-pullups->analyzed
State-Changed-By: rin%NetBSD.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 14:49:26 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Pulled up to netbsd-10. Leave this `analyzed` for a while:
- Aren't there similar deadlock scenarios?
- Is netbsd-9 not affected?
- How about mrg@'s proposal?

Prev by Date: Re: port-alpha/58602 (cy82c693_init() calls bus_space_map() with spin lock held)
Next by Date: Re: standards/57807 (#include <arpa/inet.h> spuriously defines le32enc/be32enc/... under _XOPEN_SOURCE=700)
Previous by Thread: re: kern/58531 (NetBSD 10.0 deadlock in nd_timer)
Next by Thread: Re: misc/58599 (man pages lack POSIX 2024 citation syntax)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index