NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: misc/58600: man pages lack C17, C23, C++98, C++03, C++11, C++17, C++20, C++23 citation syntax
- To: misc-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,campbell+netbsd%mumble.net@localhost
- Subject: Re: misc/58600: man pages lack C17, C23, C++98, C++03, C++11, C++17, C++20, C++23 citation syntax
- From: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:00:03 +0000 (UTC)
The following reply was made to PR misc/58600; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: misc/58600: man pages lack C17, C23, C++98, C++03, C++11, C++17,
C++20, C++23 citation syntax
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:57:16 +0200
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 02:40:01PM +0000, campbell+netbsd%mumble.net@localhost wrote:
> We have
>
> .St -isoC-2011
>
> for C11, and mdoc(7) documents
>
> .St -isoC-2018
>
> but doesn't say what it's for (is it C17, i.e., ISO/IEC 9899:2018?).
On this particular point: Just googling this I found
https://blog.ansi.org/2018/11/c-language-standard-iso-iec-9899-2018-c18/
and this page says
"The Current C Programming Language Standard â?? ISO/IEC 9899:2018 (C18)"
so perhaps ANSI just prefers C18 to C17, I don't know.
Thomas
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index