NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: misc/57286
The following reply was made to PR misc/57286; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: misc/57286
Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 01:42:53 +0000
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 03:10:02PM +0000, Jim Spath wrote:
> > " it might fail if "
>
> Thank you for reviewing the results and explaining the logic. It seems
> I have done as much as possible from a user regression test
> perspective. Test failures in this case do not imply a system code
> issue.
>
> Whether this test should be updated or skipped, I do not know. I will
> continue with other tests meanwhile.
Well, the other question is whether it's actually leaking vnodes.
Insisting that there are ~4000 busy seems slightly suspect, but it
depends of course on what else is running.
It looks like this test does not use rump, which is a little
surprising...
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index