NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: misc/57286



The following reply was made to PR misc/57286; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: misc/57286
Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 01:42:53 +0000

 On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 03:10:02PM +0000, Jim Spath wrote:
  >  > " it might fail if "
  >  
  >  Thank you for reviewing the results and explaining the logic. It seems
  >  I have done as much as possible from a user regression test
  >  perspective. Test failures in this case do not imply a system code
  >  issue.
  >  
  >  Whether this test should be updated or skipped, I do not know. I will
  >  continue with other tests meanwhile.
 
 Well, the other question is whether it's actually leaking vnodes.
 Insisting that there are ~4000 busy seems slightly suspect, but it
 depends of course on what else is running.
 
 It looks like this test does not use rump, which is a little
 surprising...
 
 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index