Re: port-amd64/57266: Poor disk performance on VirtualBox vioscsi0 and NetBSD 10.0_BETA

[Bartłomiej Krawczyk <bbartlomiej%gmail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/57266; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bart=c5=82omiej_Krawczyk?= <bbartlomiej%gmail.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-amd64/57266: Poor disk performance on VirtualBox vioscsi0
 and NetBSD 10.0_BETA
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:38:23 +0100

 On 14/03/2023 05:05, Michael van Elst wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/57266; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: port-amd64/57266: Poor disk performance on VirtualBox vioscsi0 and NetBSD 10.0_BETA
 > Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:00:00 -0000 (UTC)
 > 
 >   bbartlomiej.mail%gmail.com@localhost (Bartek Krawczyk) writes:
 >   
 >   >Indeed there was, but not with VirtualBox but with Windows 11.
 >   >Windows has Hyper-V tightly integrated nowadays and a lot of security
 >   >features are based on that.
 >   
 >   But the question remains why this didn't affect other guests.
 >   
 
 That's what threw me off. It impacted Linux guests much less with the 
 same VirtIO driver on the VirtualBox side. If I find anything else I'll 
 raise a bug upstream.
 Unless anybody has any idea what logs to gather from NetBSD?
 
 -- 
 Pozdrawiam
 BartÅ?omiej Krawczyk