NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: port-amd64/57236 (Gude, 9.8, https://netbsd.org/docs/guide/en/chap-x.html#chap-x-xdm is wrong)
The following reply was made to PR xsrc/57236; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: gutteridge%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, m.kozlowski%mini.pw.edu.pl@localhost
Subject: re: port-amd64/57236 (Gude, 9.8, https://netbsd.org/docs/guide/en/chap-x.html#chap-x-xdm is wrong)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 06:28:15 +1100
> The issue is basically that as we presently distribute xdm, it won't
> interoperate properly with some modern X applications, because the
> authorization mechanism it defaults to doesn't work. This was surprising
> to me as well (I don't use xdm or any other display manager), as the
> error messages aren't clear here about what's happening. I was able to
> reproduce this myself and test the configuration tweak.
>
> Other BSDs and Linux distros dealt with this years ago; e.g., FreeBSD
> changed the default in the configuration to be what I suggested, Debian
> changed xdm's compilation settings to fundamentally disable the xdm
> authorization method, etc. I feel NetBSD should do something of the sort
> as well, but that probably requires discussion among developers. So, for
> now, I've adjusted chapter 9.8 in the guide to add this detail.
i'm confused. the default should be:
"XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1"
so i'm not sure why the xdm-config setting is needed. or is it
that "XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1" method doesn't work at all, and it
can only be "MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1"? this seems to be the default,
since libXdcmp default to including XdmcpWrap.c, which means
xdm finds it and enables xdm auth methods.
anyway, we can fix this i'm sure, but i don't understand what's
wrong or why the change helps.
thanks.
.mrg.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index