Re: kern/56737: WDCTL_RST errors in 9.99.92 and 9.99.93

[Robert Nestor <rnestor%mac.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/56737; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Robert Nestor <rnestor%mac.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/56737: WDCTL_RST errors in 9.99.92 and 9.99.93
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 11:26:14 -0600

 On Jan 5, 2023, at 10:50 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
 
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/56737; it has been noted by =
 GNATS.
 >=20
 > From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
 > To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
 > Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: kern/56737: WDCTL_RST errors in 9.99.92 and 9.99.93
 > Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 17:45:32 +0100
 >=20
 > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 05:11:25PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 >> Yes, I think we should make some of these delays non-optional again
 >> I don't have a setup where these delays are needed handy, so I can't =
 really
 >> test this.
 >=20
 > I have one where it happens but only like once a week or so, not quite =
 good
 > enough for testing this.
 >=20
 > Bob, can you test it quicker?
 > If so I'll come up with another patch to try.
 >=20
 > Martin
 
 If it just involves building a new kernel and testing with the HW on =
 hand then, yes I can test with the slow drives I have.  That cycle =
 usually only takes me an hour or so to do.  Just let me know what =
 patches you=92d like me to apply and test with.
 
 -bob=