Re: port-arm/50687 (src/sys/arch/arm/at91/at91emac.c:792: possible bad bitmask ?)

To: port-arm-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,skrll%NetBSD.org@localhost,dcb314%hotmail.com@localhost
Subject: Re: port-arm/50687 (src/sys/arch/arm/at91/at91emac.c:792: possible bad bitmask ?)
From: skrll%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:00:39 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: src/sys/arch/arm/at91/at91emac.c:792: possible bad bitmask ?

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: skrll%NetBSD.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 07:00:38 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Duplicate bit field define removed.
Someone with hardware should test and report any problems.

Prev by Date: Re: port-arm/54214 (crash)
Next by Date: Re: port-arm/56264 (diagnostic assertion "l->l_stat == LSONPROC" failed on RPI3)
Previous by Thread: kern/56484: mcx(4) fails to work since r1.15 on QNAP QXG-10G2SF-CX4
Next by Thread: PR/50687 CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/at91
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index