Re: lib/56388: curses addstr test fails for LP64BE platforms

[Rin Okuyama <rokuyama.rk%gmail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR lib/56388; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Rin Okuyama <rokuyama.rk%gmail.com@localhost>
To: Brett Lymn <blymn%internode.on.net@localhost>,
 "gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: lib/56388: curses addstr test fails for LP64BE platforms
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:33:51 +0900

 On 2021/09/07 7:13, Brett Lymn wrote:
 > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 09:25:28PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
 >>
 >> So, I think that check_files/addstr2.chk is generated depending on
 >> ``wrong'' behavior due to the bug, and should be regenerated after
 >> the bug is fixed.
 >>
 >> Thoughts?
 >>
 > 
 > Yes, the check file should be regenerated.  Initially when writing the
 > tests I was manually generating the check files but this takes too much
 > time and is hard to maintain so now current behaviour is captured -
 > wrong or right.  So, yes, if the behaviour changes when a bug is fixed
 > then the check needs to be regenerated as long as the impacts on other
 > tests (if any) are considered.
 > 
 
 Committed. As far as I can see, the change does not hurt other tests.
 Thank you so much for the useful comments!
 
 rin