Re: lib/56388: curses addstr test fails for LP64BE platforms

[Brett Lymn <blymn%internode.on.net@localhost>]

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 09:25:28PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> 
> So, I think that check_files/addstr2.chk is generated depending on
> ``wrong'' behavior due to the bug, and should be regenerated after
> the bug is fixed.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

Yes, the check file should be regenerated.  Initially when writing the
tests I was manually generating the check files but this takes too much
time and is hard to maintain so now current behaviour is captured -
wrong or right.  So, yes, if the behaviour changes when a bug is fixed
then the check needs to be regenerated as long as the impacts on other
tests (if any) are considered.

-- 
Brett Lymn
--
Sent from my NetBSD device.

"We are were wolves",
"You mean werewolves?",
"No we were wolves, now we are something else entirely",
"Oh"