[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-alpha/33073 (isp0: unable to load dma (22))
The following reply was made to PR port-alpha/33073; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
To: Michael Haardt <michael%moria.de@localhost>
Jason Thorpe <thorpej%netbsd.org@localhost>,
Subject: Re: port-alpha/33073 (isp0: unable to load dma (22))
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:27:09 -0700
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 11:14 AM, Michael Haardt <michael%moria.de@localhost> wrote:
> I see nothing odd during booting, but wonder if "auto" should have =
> propagated from nsphy0 to tlp0:
> [ 1.0000000] cia0 at mainbus0: DECchip 2117x Core Logic Chipset =
(Pyxis), pass 2
> [ 1.0000000] cia0: extended capabilities: 0x1<BWEN>
> [ 1.0000000] cia0: using BWX for PCI config access
> [ 1.0000000] pci0 at cia0 bus 0
> [ 1.0000000] pci0: i/o space, memory space enabled, rd/line, =
rd/mult, wr/inv ok
> [ 1.0000000] tlp0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0: DECchip 21143 Ethernet, =
> [ 1.0000000] tlp0: interrupting at dec 550 irq 0
> [ 1.0000000] tlp0: DEC, Ethernet address 00:00:f8:76:0e:39
> [ 1.0000000] nsphy0 at tlp0 phy 5: DP83840 10/100 media interface, =
> [ 1.0000000] nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, =
> [ 1.0000000] tlp0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10base2, 10base5
Huh... can you provide the tlp-related boot messages from 9.2 as well? =
This bug is almost certainly my fault, but seeing the previous output =
would be helpful in figuring out how I broke it :-)
If you could gather that up and then file a new bug report for the tlp =
issue, I would really appreciate it!
> During unpacking, I see a flood of "Warning: received processor
> correctable error." Is there any additional information which =
> of the system may be causing that?
I guess this is probably due to a flaky memory module. We would need to =
decode the machine check logout frame. I'll investigate this.
> Anyway: The DMA problems are gone and unpacking the sets to the disk
> finishes. I guess none of the above is related to port-alpha/33073,
> but I wanted to mention it nevertheless. Thanks for fixing this one!
Ok, good news, thanks for confirming!
Main Index |
Thread Index |