NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-xen/55285: XEN3_DOM0 panics with GSI fail
The following reply was made to PR port-xen/55285; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFyb23DrXIgRG9sZcSNZWs=?= <jaromir.dolecek%gmail.com@localhost>
To: Frank Kardel <kardel%netbsd.org@localhost>, "gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-xen/55285: XEN3_DOM0 panics with GSI fail
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 18:26:55 +0200
Frank,
I see this in the xen boot:
(XEN) CPU0: VMX disabled by BIOS.
(XEN) VMX: failed to initialise.
Can you please check your BIOS and see if you can enable anything
related to VT-x or VT-d or virtualization in general, and see if it
makes any difference?
Jaromir
Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 =C3=A0 09:51, Frank Kardel <kardel%netbsd.org@localhost> a =C3=
=A9crit :
>
> Yes it still panics with PCPU_IDT patch installed and NO_PCI_MSI_MSIX
> commented out regardless of PCPU_IDT option being present or not.
>
> NO_PCI_MSI_MSIX makes it boot successfully.
>
> Frank
>
> [ 1.0000030] vendor 8086 product a1ed (undefined, subclass 0x00,
> revision 0x09) at pci0 dev 17 function 1 not configured
> [ 1.0000030] ahcisata0 at pci0 dev 17 function 5: vendor 8086 product
> a1d2 (rev. 0x09)
> [ 1.0000030] ahcisata0: AHCI revision 1.31, 2 ports, 32 slots, CAP
> 0xeb34ff41<EMS,PSC,SSC,PMD,SAM,ISS=3D0x3=3DGen3,SCLO,SAL,SSS,SSNTF,SNCQ,S=
64A>
> [ 1.0000030] panic: physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq) MSI fail - 5:
> vendor 8086 product a1d2 (rev. 0x09)
> [ 1.0000030] ahcisata0: AHCI revision 1.31, 2 ports, 32 slots, CAP
> 0xeb34ff41<EMS,PSC,SSC,PMD,SAM,ISS=3D0x3=3DGen3,SCLO,SAL,SSS,SSNTF,SNCQ,S=
64A>
> [ 1.0000030] panic: physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq) MSI fail -19
> [ 1.0000030] cpu0: Begin traceback...
> [ 1.0000030] vpanic() at netbsd:vpanic+0x146
> [ 1.0000030] snprintf() at netbsd:snprintf
> [ 1.0000030] xen_pic_to_gsi() at netbsd:xen_pic_to_gsi+0x32c
> [ 1.0000030] intr_establish_xname() at netbsd:intr_establish_xname+0x8e
> [ 1.0000030] x86_pci_msi_establish() at netbsd:x86_pci_msi_establish+0x=
7c
> [ 1.0000030] ahci_pci_intr_establish() at
> netbsd:ahci_pci_intr_establish+0x1ac
> [ 1.0000030] ahci_attach() at netbsd:ahci_attach+0x2fc
> [ 1.0000030] ahci_pci_attach() at netbsd:ahci_pci_attach+0x21a
> [ 1.0000030] config_attach_loc() at netbsd:config_attach_loc+0x17a
> [ 1.0000030] pci_probe_device() at netbsd:pci_probe_device+0x571
> [ 1.0000030] pci_enumerate_bus() at netbsd:pci_enumerate_bus+0x1b7
> [ 1.0000030] pcirescan() at netbsd:pcirescan+0x4e
> [ 1.0000030] pciattach() at netbsd:pciattach+0x186
> [ 1.0000030] config_attach_loc() at netbsd:config_attach_loc+0x17a
> [ 1.0000030] mp_pci_scan() at netbsd:mp_pci_scan+0xa4
> [ 1.0000030] hypervisor_attach() at netbsd:hypervisor_attach+0x3df
> [ 1.0000030] config_attach_loc() at netbsd:config_attach_loc+0x17a
> [ 1.0000030] xen_mainbus_attach() at netbsd:xen_mainbus_attach+0x51
> [ 1.0000030] mainbupci_scan+0xa4
> [ 1.0000030] hypervisor_attach() at netbsd:hypervisor_attach+0x3df
> [ 1.0000030] config_attach_loc() at netbsd:config_attach_loc+0x17a
> [ 1.0000030] xen_mainbus_attach() at netbsd:xen_mainbus_attach+0x51
> [ 1.0000030] mainbus_attach() at netbsd:mainbus_attach+0x49
> [ 1.0000030] config_attach_loc() at netbsd:config_attach_loc+0x17a
> [ 1.0000030] cpu_configure() at netbsd:cpu_configure+0x25
> [ 1.0000030] main() at netbsd:main+0x2ec
> [ 1.0000030] cpu0: End traces_attach() at netbsd:mainbus_attach+0x49
> [ 1.0000030] config_attach_loc() at netbsd:config_attach_loc+0x17a
> [ 1.0000030] cpu_configure() at netbsd:cpu_configure+0x25
> [ 1.0000030] main() at netbsd:main+0x2ec
> [ 1.0000030] cpu0: End traceback...
> [ 1.0000030] fatal breakpoint trap in supervisor mode
> [ 1.0000030] trap type 1 code 0 rip 0xffffffff8023e93d cs 0xe030
> rflags 0x202 cr2 0 ilevel 0x8 rsp 0xffffffff819933f0
> [ 1.0000030] curlwp 0xffffffff80e6c700 pid 0.0 lowest kstacback...
>
>
> On 07/11/20 17:16, Jarom=C3=ADr Dole=C4=8Dek wrote:
> > Hi,
> > can you confirm whether the Xen Dom0 panic still happens when using
> > the IDT patch? I don't think it would affect it, but it's worth
> > checking.
> >
> > You'd need to compile a XEN3_DOM0 kernel with the option
> > NO_PCI_MSI_MSIX commented out.
> >
> > Jaromir
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index