NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-vax/55415: vax no longer preempts in a timely fashion
The following reply was made to PR port-vax/55415; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Anders Magnusson <ragge%tethuvudet.se@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, port-vax-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, oster%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-vax/55415: vax no longer preempts in a timely fashion
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 08:54:15 +0200
Den 2020-06-25 kl. 17:00, skrev Greg Oster:
> The following reply was made to PR port-vax/55415; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Greg Oster <oster%netbsd.org@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: port-vax/55415: vax no longer preempts in a timely fashion
> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:55:50 -0600
>
> On 6/25/20 3:15 AM, Anders Magnusson wrote:
> > The following reply was made to PR port-vax/55415; it has been noted by GNATS.
> >
> > From: Anders Magnusson <ragge%tethuvudet.se@localhost>
> > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: port-vax/55415: vax no longer preempts in a timely fashion
> > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:10:42 +0200
> >
> > Will it work if you only restore the removed line in cpu.h?
>
> Yes, yes it does! So it's just one line that needs to be restored to
> get things working properly.
>
Great!
The other missing line should not be needed as I understand the code in
sched_resched_cpu().
ci_want_resched should always be set already when cpu_need_resched() is
called.
I'll try to fire up my 4000/90 this weekend and see if I can find this bug.
-- R
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index