NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/55402: amd64/9.99.68/9.99.68: xen/zfs - kernel: double fault trap, code=0
The following reply was made to PR kern/55402; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Frank Kardel <kardel%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/55402: amd64/9.99.68/9.99.68: xen/zfs - kernel: double fault
trap, code=0
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:28:18 +0200
That did it - the scrub run now completed successfully.
Frank
On 06/20/20 19:00, JaromÃr DoleÄ?ek wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/55402; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFyb23DrXIgRG9sZcSNZWs=?= <jaromir.dolecek%gmail.com@localhost>
> To: "gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: kern/55402: amd64/9.99.68/9.99.68: xen/zfs - kernel: double fault
> trap, code=0
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:55:28 +0200
>
> Le sam. 20 juin 2020 =C3=A0 15:45, Frank Kardel <kardel%netbsd.org@localhost> a =C3=
> =A9crit :
> > Well it goes a bit further but hits the double fault
> >
> > now with 57 frames (two > 1k) at about the same accumulated stack size.
> >
> > Some space was saved by the patch, but presumably not enough.
>
> OK, I've updated the patch. My previous change in
> vdev_queue_io_to_issue() did not work, gcc returns the stack on the
> end of the function, not when going out of the block.
>
> New version reduced vdev_queue_io_to_issue() to use only 160 bytes of
> stack instead of 1152, and dsl_scan_visitbp()+ dsl_scan_visitdnode()
> pair now takes 40 less bytes.
>
> Can you check if this is enough to get it through?
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~jdolecek/zfs_reduce_stack.diff
>
> Jaromir
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index