NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

re: kern/54855 (New "ahcisata0 port 1: device present" messages with NetBSD 9)



The following reply was made to PR kern/54855; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
To: Simon Burge <simonb%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: jdolecek%netbsd.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
    netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
    gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: re: kern/54855 (New "ahcisata0 port 1: device present" messages with NetBSD 9)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:50:28 +1100

 Simon Burge writes:
 > jdolecek%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 > =
 
 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > > State-Changed-By: jdolecek%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > > State-Changed-When: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 21:21:57 +0000
 > > State-Changed-Why:
 > > -current with sys/dev/ata/wd.c rev.1.454 should now disable NCQ by def=
 ault,
 > > can you check that fixes the problem for you?
 > =
 
 > That diff applied cleanly to the netbsd-9 branch and I've built a new
 > kernel.  I'll test this tonight when I get home.
 > =
 
 > https://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/product/consumer/860e=
 vo/
 > says these are the models in the 860 EVO range:
 > =
 
 > 	250 GB, 500 GB, 1,000 GB, 2,000 GB, 4,000 GB
 > =
 
 > I saw mention of the 250GB model having problems in one of the forums.
 > We should add the extra model sizes to the quirk list?
 
 i'm glad we've figured out what is the trigger here it seems.
 howver, i am not a fan of the current solution, and think it
 should be restricted to known bad combos.
 
 most people with 860 EVOs are successful with NCQ, i'm one
 of them with a 500GB model, with netbsd-9 for months now,
 and they're a wildly successful line i'm sure many others
 also have working happily with NCQ.
 
 we don't know what the real issue is.  perhaps it is a =
 
 problem that the controller had that these drives trigger,
 rather than a problem with them, so perhaps we should
 disable it on the controller instead of the drive, if
 we're going to pick one of the two triggers here.
 
 
 .mrg.
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index