[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: install/54844: ``build.sh install-image'' fails with -V USE_PIGZGZIP=yes
On Jan 8, 4:45pm, paul%whooppee.com@localhost (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: install/54844: ``build.sh install-image'' fails with -V USE_P
| The following reply was made to PR install/54844; it has been noted by GNATS.
| From: Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>
| To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
| Cc: martin%duskware.de@localhost
| Subject: Re: install/54844: ``build.sh install-image'' fails with -V
| Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 08:42:50 -0800 (PST)
| On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Paul Goyette wrote:
| > I'm not so sure this is just a size issue. At one point I actually
| > looked at the contents of the work directory, and found _another_
| > work directory a couple levels down. The lower-level work directory
| > seemed to be the correct size.
| > Perhaps there are some conflicting command-line args that work for
| > xz but not for pigz? (Guesing: Perhaps related to sym-links?)
| Well, I just checked again, and I don't see the "nested" work directory.
| So perhapas setting the size as you suggest is appropriate.
But why is it that much bigger?
Main Index |
Thread Index |