NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/42314: IC Plus IP100x PHY support
Hi,
Yes, setting 1000baseT-FDX ends up in watchdog timeout for me too.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:04 PM SAITOH Masanobu <msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost> wrote:
>
> On 2019/11/18 23:46, SAITOH Masanobu wrote:
> > On 2019/11/15 2:42, Andrius V wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Tested, didn't notice any regressions, auto-negotiation configures
> >> 1000baseT full-duplex as expected (doesn't matter if on boot or using
> >> "ifconfig vge0 media auto" manually). Setting media type explicitly to
> >> 1000baseT selects 100baseTX though (which is an improvement, since it
> >> was completely failing with the original code).
> >
> > On my machine, forcing 1000baseT-FDX usually got a link as it is, but
> > sometimes got a link as 100baseTX-FDX. I suspect it depend on your
> > cable and/or the link partner. Some PHYs include IP1000A and IP1001
> > have a feature called downshift. If the PHY detect it can't link 1000baseT,
> > it downgrade to 100baseT. It can be disabled by clearing IPGPHY_SCSR_DOWNSHIFT_ENB
> > bit.
> >
> >> From dmesg:
> >>
> >> [ 1.050249] vge0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: VIA VT612X Gigabit
> >> Ethernet (rev. 0x82)
> >> [ 1.050249] vge0: interrupting at ioapic1 pin 12
> >> [ 1.050249] vge0: Ethernet address xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
> >> [ 1.050249] ipgphy0 at vge0 phy 22: IP1001 10/100/1000 PHY, rev. 0
> >> [ 1.050249] 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX,
> >> 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto
> >
> > I have the same one (I have both stge+IP1000A and vge+IP1001).
> >
> >> ifconfig vge0 (auto)
> >> vge0: flags=0x8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> >> capabilities=3f00<IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx,TCP4CSUM_Tx>
> >> capabilities=3f00<UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx>
> >> enabled=0
> >> ec_capabilities=7<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU>
> >> ec_enabled=2<VLAN_HWTAGGING>
> >> address: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
> >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT
> >> full-duplex,flowcontrol,master,rxpause,txpause)
> >> status: active
> >> inet 192.168.1.10/24 broadcast 192.168.1.255 flags 0x0
> >> inet6 fe80::8c9e:c8a0:eb4b:731f%vge0/64 flags 0x0 scopeid 0x1
> >> ifconfig vge0 (1000baseT):
> >> vge0: flags=0x8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> >> capabilities=3f00<IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx,TCP4CSUM_Tx>
> >> capabilities=3f00<UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx>
> >> enabled=0
> >> ec_capabilities=7<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU>
> >> ec_enabled=2<VLAN_HWTAGGING>
> >> address: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
> >> media: Ethernet 1000baseT (100baseTX
> >> full-duplex,flowcontrol,rxpause,txpause)
> >> status: active
> >
> > It seems you set "ifconfig vge0 media 1000baseT" and the resulted link
> > is 100baseT. It would be good to try ifconfig vge0 media "1000baseT-FDX"
> >
> > On my environment:
> >> # ifconfig vge0
> >> vge0: flags=0x8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> >> capabilities=3f00<IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx,TCP4CSUM_Tx>
> >> capabilities=3f00<UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx>
> >> enabled=0
> >> ec_capabilities=7<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU>
> >> ec_enabled=2<VLAN_HWTAGGING>
> >> address: 00:02:2a:e0:4b:a9
> >> media: Ethernet 1000baseT full-duplex (1000baseT full-duplex,flowcontrol,rxpause,txpause)
> >> status: active
>
> Even though the link was established as 1000baseTX-FDX,
> vge0 got watchdog timeout as:
> > vge0: soft reset timed outvge0: watchdog timeout
>
> and repeat linkdown -> linkup -> watchdog. I suspect some addition
> might be required into if_vge.c. stge0 doesn't have such problem.
>
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> inet 192.168.1.10/24 broadcast 192.168.1.255 flags 0x0
> >> inet6 fe80::8c9e:c8a0:eb4b:731f%vge0/64 flags 0x0 scopeid 0x1
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Andrius V
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:48 AM Andrius V <vezhlys%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Sure, will do sometime today, once the changes will be synced with
> >>> fossil/git repos.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:10 AM Masanobu SAITOH <msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The following reply was made to PR kern/42314; it has been noted by GNATS.
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Masanobu SAITOH <msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost>
> >>>> To: Andrius V <vezhlys%gmail.com@localhost>
> >>>> Cc: msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost, msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
> >>>> netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, tharada%oucrc.org@localhost, gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> >>>> Subject: Re: kern/42314: IC Plus IP100x PHY support
> >>>> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:09:20 +0900
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2019/10/09 0:38, Andrius V wrote:
> >>>> > Hi,
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> It's merged!
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thank you! Tested, working as expected.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> Additional patch are also welcomed.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Sure, if I will have something.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Regards,
> >>>> > Andrius V
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you test with the latest ipgphy.c(rev. 1.4)?
> >>>>
> >>>> Also please show me the output of the dmesg (both MAC and PHY).
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> -----------------------------------------------
> >>>> SAITOH Masanobu (msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
> >>>> msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost)
> >>>>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> SAITOH Masanobu (msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
> msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost)
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index