Re: toolchain/54659: MACHINE_ARCH should be earmv5 on zaurus?

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR toolchain/54659; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: toolchain/54659: MACHINE_ARCH should be earmv5 on zaurus?
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:52:40 +0100

 On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:50:00PM +0000, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
 > I wonder if we should change it from earm to earmv5.
 > (a bit annoying to use pkgsrc binaries built for other arm ports)
 
 Isn't earm == earmv5 in our current world? The older cpus (like strongarm)
 get earmv4.
 
 But as Nick uses to say: "earm should die" (meaning: it should be earmv5
 to avoid this kind of confusion).
 
 Martin