NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
RE: lib/54272: libedit segfaults on Linux aarch64 build
The following reply was made to PR lib/54272; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
To: Mitch Felton <Mitchell.Felton%wdc.com@localhost>,
"gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>,
"lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost" <lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost>,
"gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost>,
"netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
Cc:
Subject: RE: lib/54272: libedit segfaults on Linux aarch64 build
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 10:57:52 -0400
On Jun 7, 2:40pm, Mitchell.Felton%wdc.com@localhost (Mitch Felton) wrote:
-- Subject: RE: lib/54272: libedit segfaults on Linux aarch64 build
| I spent some more time debugging this today and you are correct that my fix=
| is wrong. It looks like the tgetstr() call that you mentioned is returning=
| a pointer to invalid memory. Here's the signature of tgetstr():
| char *tgetstr(char *id, char **area);
| The difference between a good run on my x86_64 system and a bad run on my a=
| arch64 system seems to be that the return pointer has the upper 16 bits all=
| set (0xffff000000000000). For example, it returns 0xfffffffff89b7fa7 inste=
| ad of 0xfffff89b7fa7 (which is a pointer to the area buffer that it updated=
| ). So it appears that this is in fact a problem somewhere in tgetstr() and =
| not with libedit.
Thanks Mitch, I would suggest running this with valgrind or turning on
the address sanitizer on gcc... Although you might need compile ncurses
with it, so valgrind is probably easier.
christos
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index