NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: PR/53998 CVS commit: src/sys/kern
The following reply was made to PR kern/53998; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?= <joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: PR/53998 CVS commit: src/sys/kern
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:38:19 +0100
Christos Zoulas a écrit :
> The following reply was made to PR kern/53998; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
> gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
> joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: PR/53998 CVS commit: src/sys/kern
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:22:40 -0500
>
> On Feb 25, 2:05pm, joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: PR/53998 CVS commit: src/sys/kern
>
> | Christos,
> |
> | I have applied bith patch (you will find in attachment patch against -8).
> |
> | This patch partially fixes this PR as my test program can create more
> | threads before first sem_init() failure. But I think there is another
> | race condition somewhere in semaphore subsystem.
> |
> | After sem_init() failure, there is no specific message in dmesg or logfile.
> |
> | I don't understand why atomic_dec_uint(&nsems_total) or
> | atomic_inc_uint(&nsems_total) are not protected by a lock.
>
> Yes, the whole thing is racy... But atomics don't need to be protected
> by locks... How does it fail now ENFILE?
LAST ERROR: Unknown error: 4294967295 (-1)
Same errno.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index