NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: bin/53891: sandy bridge i965 SNA bus error
The following reply was made to PR bin/53891; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost
Subject: re: bin/53891: sandy bridge i965 SNA bus error
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 05:29:32 +1100
> As mrg enabled backtrace -> log, here is another example - 0x12 is an
> interesting address...
pity that libbacktrace's unwinder can't cope beyond signals:
> [ 240.916] (**) Option "XkbRules" "base"
> [ 240.916] (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
> [ 240.916] (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us"
> [ 240.916] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "<default keyboa=
rd>" (type: KEYBOARD, id 7)
> [ 245.830] (EE) =
> [ 245.830] (EE) Backtrace:
> [ 245.836] (EE) 0: /usr/X11R7/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x3d) [0x3b37d3]
> [ 245.836] (EE) 1: /usr/X11R7/bin/X (os_move_fd+0x67) [0x3af9f9]
> [ 245.836] (EE) 2: /usr/lib/libc.so.12 (__sigtramp_siginfo_2+0x0) [0x=
7f7ff32a9ac0]
> [ 245.836] (EE) =
> [ 245.836] (EE) Segmentation fault at address 0x12
> [ 245.836] (EE) =
> Fatal server error:
> [ 245.836] (EE) Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server abortin=
g
so all really 0x12 means is that someone tried to access a struct member
that is at offset 0x12 but using a NULL pointer. however, as we don't
have the stack trace beyond the signal, don't know what it was. ie, my
enabling of backtrace doesn't help the main problem i hoped for.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index