[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lib/53631: openssl test failures on arm
The following reply was made to PR lib/53631; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
Subject: Re: lib/53631: openssl test failures on arm
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:15:28 -0400
On Sep 24, 8:25pm, martin%NetBSD.org@localhost (martin%NetBSD.org@localhost) wrote:
-- Subject: lib/53631: openssl test failures on arm
| >Number: 53631
| >Category: lib
| >Synopsis: openssl test failures on arm
| >Confidential: no
| >Severity: critical
| >Priority: high
| >Responsible: lib-bug-people
| >State: open
| >Class: sw-bug
| >Submitter-Id: net
| >Arrival-Date: Mon Sep 24 20:25:00 +0000 2018
| >Originator: Martin Husemann
| >Release: NetBSD 8.99.25
| The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
| System: NetBSD space-truckin.duskware.de 8.99.25 NetBSD 8.99.25 (SUNXI) #69: Mon Sep 24 15:56:45 CEST 2018 martin%night-owl.duskware.de@localhost:/usr/src/sys/arch/evbarm/compile/SUNXI evbarm
| Architecture: earmv7hfeb
| Machine: evbarm
| After the openssl update, lots of libcrypto tests fail:
| crypto/libcrypto/t_hashes (677/760): 6 test cases
| hmac: [0.837220s] Passed.
| md2: [0.681949s] Passed.
| md4: [0.557451s] Failed: atf-check failed; see the output of the test for details
| md5: [0.567451s] Failed: atf-check failed; see the output of the test for details
| mdc2: [0.717054s] Passed.
| ripemd: [0.557522s] Failed: atf-check failed; see the output of the test for details
| crypto/libcrypto/t_libcrypto (678/760): 5 test cases
| bn: [81.867298s] Passed.
| conf: [0.796839s] Passed.
| engine: [0.849213s] Passed.
| rand: [0.577380s] Failed: atf-check failed; see the output of the test for details
| threads: [0.821741s] Passed.
| This is partly due to what appears to be incompatible command line parsing
| changes or something:
These tests have been removed since the code has been removed for those
hash functions for security reasons..
Main Index |
Thread Index |