Re: port-amd64/53113: NetBSD_8.0_BETA/amd64 fails to boot.

[Utkarsh Anand <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>]

21.03.2018, 20:15, "Leonardo Taccari" <leot%netbsd.org@localhost>:
> The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/53113; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Leonardo Taccari <leot%NetBSD.org@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: port-amd64/53113: NetBSD_8.0_BETA/amd64 fails to boot.
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:40:44 +0100
>
>  Hello Utkarsh,
>
>  Utkarsh Anand writes:
>  > [...]
>  > https://imgur.com/P0qpxnf
>  > [...]
>  > As you can see, it still has the same problem. But sysinst works.
>  > So, I tried installing NetBSD on a new raw disk image and it
>  > succeeded. But, upon subsequent reboot, it showed me an error that
>  > the file system is read-only. I was not able to create new files.
>  > [...]
>
>  At least according that image (manually typed by myself so can
>  contains some errors):
>
>   [...]
>   wd0 at atabus0 drive 0
>   wd0: <QEMU HARDDISK>
>   wd0: 1450 MB, 2946 cyl, 16 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 2969600 sectors
>   [...]
>   boot device: wd0
>   root on wd0a dumps on wd0b
>   root file system type: ffs
>   [...]
>   mount_ffs: /dev/sd0a on /: specified device does not match mounted device
>   cp: /etc/gettytab: Read-only file system
>   init: can't add utmpx record for 'system boot': Bad file descriptor
>   init: can't add utmpx record for 'runlevel': Bad file descriptor
>   init: can't add utmpx record for 'console': Bad file descriptor
>   [...]
>
>  ...are there any entry in `/etc/fstab' that refers to `sd0a' instead of
>  `wd0a'? (if yes I would substitute `sd0a' with `wd0a' as it sounds like
>  that NetBSD is installed in `wd0').
I haven't attached the disk on which I installed NetBSD in the screenshot. But, I installed it on /dev/wd1a and that's what present in /etc/fstab. But, as I said, it's a read-only filesystem so I can neither manipulate nor create new files on it. Isn't there anybody who has tried cross-building recently?
I have also attached the screenshots a vm having netbsd installed in both wd0a and wd1a (just in case):
https://imgur.com/ydM5I8r
https://imgur.com/ILanlKE
PS: TERM was also not set, but that wasn't a big problem.