Re: port-amd64/53113: NetBSD_8.0_BETA/amd64 fails to boot.

[Utkarsh Anand <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/53113; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Utkarsh Anand <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>
To: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Cc: "gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: port-amd64/53113: NetBSD_8.0_BETA/amd64 fails to boot.
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:34:24 +0530

 21.03.2018, 16:00, "Martin Husemann" <martin%duskware.de@localhost>:
 > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 03:46:43PM +0530, Utkarsh Anand wrote:
 >
 >> Â Hey!
 >> Â https://github.com/NetBSD/src/commit/c20c0c7bce5a6b954d5fea0a3932bfa569523a57
 >> Â shows that netbsd-8 still uses 1400 MB as size while netbsd-current
 >> Â uses 1450 MB which was bumped 6 months ago
 >> Â https://github.com/NetBSD/src/commit/48053fec549ddfcb2412db8778f0cbf7e6bc9f63
 >> Â . So my number of sectors is correct too. Could 'not bumping' the size
 >> Â for netbsd-8 be a problem? should it also be bumped
 >
 > No, the build would fail if it does not fit.
 >
 > Why don't you just try it on another usb device? And if your image still
 > fails, try one from the official daily snapshots?
 Thankfully, I didn't try them again. Turns out the images are faulty. I tested them on virtualbox. Have a look at the screenshots:
 https://imgur.com/6HdOpWc
 https://imgur.com/m4ckT5F
 https://imgur.com/2SXx45M
 https://imgur.com/35T8dJB
 
 This means that there was an issue with cross building. I'll build it on another system and have a look at the images again.
 >
 > Martin