NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: lib/52842: Obsolete brk(2)/sbrk(2)



The following reply was made to PR lib/52842; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: lib/52842: Obsolete brk(2)/sbrk(2)
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 23:42:40 +0100

 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
 --OjrcGKq0mlIkbubkUmpttjEl3sNhHbu5x
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="biQ3uC0Mb74WFxhxnlmiLXxEO9WBjAF66";
  protected-headers="v1"
 From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
 To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 Message-ID: <ba41cfa0-beb0-218a-7788-6a2e2e663bb0%gmx.com@localhost>
 Subject: Re: lib/52842: Obsolete brk(2)/sbrk(2)
 References: <pr-lib-52842%gnats.netbsd.org@localhost>
  <20171219231250.AF0407A1E6%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
  <20180105201000.B7F277A1CF%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
 In-Reply-To: <20180105201000.B7F277A1CF%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
 
 --biQ3uC0Mb74WFxhxnlmiLXxEO9WBjAF66
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 Content-Language: en-US
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On 05.01.2018 21:10, matthew green wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR lib/52842; it has been noted by GNAT=
 S.
 >=20
 > From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 >     netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Subject: re: lib/52842: Obsolete brk(2)/sbrk(2)
 > Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 07:06:50 +1100
 >=20
 >  why?
 > =20
 >  there's no good reason to remove this useful functionality.
 >  we'll need to keep it for backwards compat anyway.  i'm not
 >  even sure you can do it without significantly restructuring
 >  how exec works.
 > =20
 >  i don't see any real benefit.
 > =20
 > =20
 >  .mrg.
 > =20
 >=20
 
 I will try to come with a rationale within a few days, first I need to
 prepare and perform some tests.
 
 The kernel part should stay as it is - for compatibility reasons with
 existing applications.
 
 
 --biQ3uC0Mb74WFxhxnlmiLXxEO9WBjAF66--
 
 --OjrcGKq0mlIkbubkUmpttjEl3sNhHbu5x
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJABAEBCAAqFiEELaxVpweEzw+lMDwuS7MI6bAudmwFAlpP/2AMHG41NEBnbXgu
 Y29tAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZsPa4QAL/APYNMU2jqA13lcJTeBf145ZFSmxhTP4kQekEu
 v32rvJYjnktyc5bx07mtBPOS0LAGoosUueDtd2IC/7Q7NynR+WsAAs+QMdnQg/B6
 P9FNbZ3BwFuZuGhCcPj2QhVh8ZjR5xJ/ATaGxHxiUI0Yr5ssZqnoIUMG/uhcqNgX
 NSgFiaXezZ1f8hEWUDMyozs9ixjQwykhRlNZxCnkQM2S/PUxBt4dSYEnjjNm8pVG
 W76OHPMnFuHIS5pG+Wuv81pgIJWaeF2ZSNkz25kmwABYuuN24PJY+6ymMrCEXHAo
 2FFbI7PnUcR3tedI+M9DFEfchePG4BCtQj1msLtMPVDz6UKEWZsc+zUUtHOEA8L8
 Ob2nB3dhounGtKysija7SwIG6bX6DjsCx/IpmpvCJlu6q2tyyUp4b/HQ3s9rnEKs
 7A3YGnH0456V/xxkS6dChqaLSlXCSv5BRPTMy1UHHiHQTOYxnSg/48f9i49A4n6j
 2SsHYcuj++DtgLCC6sJir+4BeWQ6lyTf7O0fYSeeQCA8DjhbjmzoCbrzN3dB+Jo/
 Ygqv9ctJdT0wIZrHre/MO7L0DTMHBDo0ROAagYjP0wjEjiHHXpcsWE7fWSM62u3f
 KDrm5AwKIt5QF3WBeWLqtS3eGX8Pkvm+x3t1XAIc4e7Ja89mS1noBK086bQYIRi0
 4foY
 =+pPu
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --OjrcGKq0mlIkbubkUmpttjEl3sNhHbu5x--
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index