Re: toolchain/52722: config(8) busy-loops, then cores

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

The following reply was made to PR toolchain/52722; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, toolchain-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, 
	gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, 
	Hauke Fath <hauke%Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE@localhost>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: toolchain/52722: config(8) busy-loops, then cores
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 11:05:34 -0500

 On Nov 18, 12:40pm, jdbaker%mylinuxisp.com@localhost ("John D. Baker") wrote:
 -- Subject: Re: toolchain/52722: config(8) busy-loops, then cores
 
 | The following reply was made to PR toolchain/52722; it has been noted by GNATS.
 | 
 | From: "John D. Baker" <jdbaker%mylinuxisp.com@localhost>
 | To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 | Cc: 
 | Subject: Re: toolchain/52722: config(8) busy-loops, then cores
 | Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:37:21 -0600 (CST)
 | 
 |  On Sat, 18 Nov 2017, John D. Baker wrote:
 |  
 |  > The following kernel config which includes "GENERIC" now falsely claims
 |  > orphaned devices in the included config:
 |  
 |  Maybe not falsely--I may have elided all devices which could provide
 |  "gpiobus?", in which case it would be right to complain.
 
 Yes, that is correct. If you add one of them (ichlpcib for example), they
 will be used again.
 
 |  I've explicitly elided "gpio* at gpiobus?", "gpioow* at gpio?" and
 |  "onewire* at gpioow?" from that kernel config (since that machine could
 |  never have them anyway) and am rebuilding.  It will take a while to get
 |  back to it.
 
 Great.
 
 christos