NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-amd64/52596



The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/52596; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dominik Bialy <dmb%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost>
To: Masanobu SAITOH <msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
	gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
	dmb%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost
Subject: Re: port-amd64/52596
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:41:43 +0200

 On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 04:50:16PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
 > Hi, Dominik.
 > 
 > On 2017/10/11 6:40, Dominik Bialy wrote:
 > > The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/52596; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > > 
 > > From: Dominik Bialy <dmb%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost>
 > > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > > Cc: port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 > > 	netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, dmb%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost
 > > Subject: Re: port-amd64/52596
 > > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:36:38 +0200
 > > 
 > >   On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:50:01PM +0000, coypu%sdf.org@localhost wrote:
 > >   > The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/52596; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > >   >
 > >   > From: coypu%sdf.org@localhost
 > >   > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > >   > Cc:
 > >   > Subject: Re: port-amd64/52596
 > >   > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:48:28 +0000
 > >   >
 > >   >  Hi,
 > >   >
 > >   >  NetBSD should be doing the following thing almost constantly:
 > >   >  if (x86_xsave_features != 0) {
 > >   >  	xsave()
 > >   >
 > >   >  which for your machine can be read as:
 > >   >  if (x86_xsave_features != 0) {
 > >   >  	panic("complain about xsave")
 > >   >
 > >   >  x86_xsave_features is only written to at boot.
 > >   >  If it doesn't panic instantly, something is likely corrupting its value.
 > >   >
 > >   >  The ACPI functions are unrelated, it's silly about what the last
 > >   >  function it prints at a backtrace is (it's after vpanic).
 > >   >
 > >   >  With DEBUG/DIAGNOSTIC and some other options you might have a chance of
 > >   >  tracking down the cause too
 > >   >
 > >   >  can you share a kernel that caused this panic?
 > >   >
 > >   https://yenn.ulegend.net/~dmb/crash/
 > >   But just now I've noticed in the dmesg:
 > >   WARNING: 2 errors while detecting hardware; check system log.
 > 
 > This two are from:
 > 
 > > acpicpu0: failed to set frequency to 1800 (err 35)
 > > acpicpu0: failed to set frequency to 1800 (err 35)
 > 
 > These two were from trying to set cpu frequency to 1800 in acpicpu_pstate_set().
 > 
 > > acpicpu0 at cpu0: ACPI CPU
 > > acpicpu0: C1: HLT, lat   0 us, pow     0 mW
 > > acpicpu0: P0: FFH, lat 100 us, pow 25000 mW, 2100 MHz
 > > acpicpu0: P1: FFH, lat 100 us, pow 22902 mW, 2000 MHz
 > > acpicpu0: P2: FFH, lat 100 us, pow 19027 mW, 1800 MHz <====== This one.
 > > acpicpu0: P3: FFH, lat 100 us, pow  8523 mW, 1000 MHz
 > > acpicpu0: T0: I/O, lat   1 us, pow     0 mW, 100 %
 > 
 > I don't know why this error happened.
 > This problem is not related to the first panic, but I'd like to know
 > why this error occurred. Could you show put the output of
 > "acpidump -dt" to the same location? (~dmb/crash)
 > 
 yenn# acpidump -dt
 acpidump: Can't find ACPI information
 
 O_O I don't know what's happening, but as I said, NetBSD 6
 worked with ACPI 3, but NetBSD 8 was rebooting just when
 the bootloader was starting the kernel, so I switched
 to ACPI 2 in the BIOS setup, and this looked like working OK.
 
 I'll also try to poke around the CPU settings in BIOS,
 because it might be that there is just a bug in the BIOS.
 
 >  Thanks in advance.
 > 
 > 
 > >   so might be that something is dying in the hardware...
 > >   Also, the panic in the dmesg (from today) is unrelated,
 > >   as it was after applying the patch from this PR --
 > >   the load was increasing for a few hours until like 250,
 > >   and then that panic happened.
 > >   Hardware problem is possible, but it would be a funny
 > >   coincidence, since it started at the time of the upgrade
 > >   from NetBSD 6 to NetBSD 8.
 > >   I'll bring it down tomorrow and run memtest86+
 > >   Dominik
 > > 
 > 
 



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index