[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
The following reply was made to PR kern/52196; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
Cc: kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/52196
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:30:37 +0200
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:25:01AM +0000, Nathanial Sloss wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/52196; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: Nathanial Sloss <nat%netbsd.org@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: kern/52196
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 20:19:39 +1000
> I think it would return EWOULDBLOCK if the write was larger.
But is that expected ? I would expect the write syscall to return
immediately in all case when the fd is set to non-blocking I/O
> What I noticed with a kernel with the old audio code was that there was a
> delay of a second or so before sound would start to play.
> I'm guessing that even with old audio it would take some time before returning
or maybe it's just that the buffer has been filled with 1s of silence,
and it has to drain ?
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |