NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-hpcmips/51309: ibm z50 crash during FTP full installation - same point but different error code



The following reply was made to PR port-hpcmips/51309; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: D Walton <walton.david%sky.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-hpcmips/51309: ibm z50 crash during FTP full installation - same point but different error code
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:48:01 +0100

 Nick
 
 I have just sent a reply. David Holland looked at the previous bug which I t=
 hink is the same.
 Don't you think he should look at this bug? I will forward the email I sent a=
  few minutes ago.
 
 David
 
 > On 5 Jul 2016, at 08:35, Nick Hudson <skrll%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
 >=20
 > The following reply was made to PR port-hpcmips/51309; it has been noted b=
 y GNATS.
 >=20
 > From: Nick Hudson <skrll%netbsd.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, port-hpcmips-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
 > gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc:=20
 > Subject: Re: port-hpcmips/51309: ibm z50 crash during FTP full installatio=
 n -
 > same point but different error code
 > Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:33:57 +0100
 >=20
 > On 07/04/16 20:40, walton.david%sky.com@localhost wrote:
 >>> Number:         51309
 >>> Category:       port-hpcmips
 >>> Synopsis:       ibm z50 crash during FTP full installation - same point b=
 ut different error code
 >>> Confidential:   no
 >>> Severity:       critical
 >>> Priority:       high
 >>> Responsible:    port-hpcmips-maintainer
 >>> State:          open
 >>> Class:          sw-bug
 >>> Submitter-Id:   net
 >>> Arrival-Date:   Mon Jul 04 19:40:00 +0000 2016
 >>> Originator:     David Walton
 >>> Release:        Version 7
 >>> Organization:
 >> Home
 >>> Environment:
 >> IBM Workpad z50, 48 MB RAM, WPC11 wireless card,(wi0), IBM 4GB PCMCIA dri=
 ve.
 >>> Description:
 >> During download of base crashed out at various % complete. Reported error=
  before a few weeks ago but has not been fixed. If you reply by email I can a=
 ttach a screen print. I typed in bt results:
 >=20
 > Which image did you use to test this? The fix is only in HEAD at the momen=
 t.
 >=20
 >=20
 > Nick
 >=20
 



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index