NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: toolchain/51147: Segmentation fault with build.sh on OpenBSD current (trying rump)
The following reply was made to PR toolchain/51147; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: <Tomas.T.Bodzar%tieto.com@localhost>
To: <toolchain-manager%netbsd.org@localhost>, <gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost>,
<netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>, <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc:
Subject: Re: toolchain/51147: Segmentation fault with build.sh on OpenBSD
current (trying rump)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 18:45:25 +0000
________________________________________=0A=
From: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>=0A=
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 6:30 PM=0A=
To: toolchain-manager%netbsd.org@localhost; gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost; netbsd-bugs@netbs=
d.org; Bodzar Tomas T=0A=
Subject: RE: toolchain/51147: Segmentation fault with build.sh on OpenBSD c=
urrent (trying rump)=0A=
=0A=
The following reply was made to PR toolchain/51147; it has been noted by GN=
ATS.=0A=
=0A=
From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)=0A=
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, toolchain-manager%netbsd.org@localhost,=0A=
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,=0A=
tomas.t.bodzar%tieto.com@localhost=0A=
Cc:=0A=
Subject: RE: toolchain/51147: Segmentation fault with build.sh on OpenBSD c=
urrent (trying rump)=0A=
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:26:33 -0400=0A=
=0A=
On May 23, 1:45pm, Tomas.T.Bodzar%tieto.com@localhost (<Tomas.T.Bodzar%tieto.com@localhost>) =
wrote:=0A=
-- Subject: RE: toolchain/51147: Segmentation fault with build.sh on OpenB=
SD=0A=
=0A=
| Christos=0A=
|=0A=
| It is further down the road=0A=
|=0A=
| $ cd /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-openbsd6.0/4.9.3/include=0A=
| $ ls -F=0A=
| adxintrin.h cpuid.h mm_malloc.h ssp/=0A=
| ammintrin.h cross-stdarg.h mmintrin.h tbmintrin.h=
=0A=
| avx2intrin.h emmintrin.h nmmintrin.h tgmath.h=0A=
| avx512cdintrin.h f16cintrin.h pmmintrin.h tmmintrin.h=
=0A=
| avx512erintrin.h fma4intrin.h popcntintrin.h unwind.h=0A=
| avx512fintrin.h fmaintrin.h prfchwintrin.h wmmintrin.h=
=0A=
| avx512pfintrin.h fxsrintrin.h quadmath.h x86intrin.h=
=0A=
| avxintrin.h ia32intrin.h quadmath_weak.h xmmintrin.h=
=0A=
| bmi2intrin.h immintrin.h rdseedintrin.h xopintrin.h=
=0A=
| bmiintrin.h lwpintrin.h rtmintrin.h xsaveintrin=
.h=0A=
| bmmintrin.h lzcntintrin.h shaintrin.h xsaveoptint=
rin.=3D=0A=
| h=0A=
| cilk/ mm3dnow.h smmintrin.h xtestintrin=
.h=0A=
| $ ls -lF ssp/=0A=
| total 36=0A=
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root bin 2402 May 14 02:17 ssp.h=0A=
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root bin 3473 May 14 02:17 stdio.h=0A=
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root bin 5720 May 14 02:17 string.h=0A=
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root bin 2816 May 14 02:17 unistd.h=0A=
=0A=
Yes, so it should be finding it... since the stdio.h is just next to it.=
=0A=
What am I missing?=0A=
=0A=
christos=0A=
=0A=
I honestly do not know. Trying to find it out too. Will be something small =
for sure. Eg.=0A=
=0A=
$ pwd=0A=
/home/username/rumprun/src-netbsd/lib/libc/ssp=0A=
$ ls -F=0A=
Makefile.inc gets_chk.c memset_chk.c =
ssp.3 strcat_chk.c strncpy_ch=
k.c=0A=
__builtin_object_size.3 memcpy_chk.c snprintf_chk.c =
stpcpy_chk.c strcpy_chk.c vsnprintf_=
chk.c=0A=
fgets_chk.c memmove_chk.c sprintf_chk.c =
stpncpy_chk.c strncat_chk.c vsprintf_c=
hk.c=0A=
$ cat Makefile.inc=0A=
# $NetBSD: Makefile.inc,v 1.5 2014/04/06 19:29:37 christos Exp $=0A=
=0A=
.PATH: ${.CURDIR}/ssp=0A=
=0A=
SSP_SRCS=3D gets_chk.c fgets_chk.c memcpy_chk.c memmove_chk.c memset_=
chk.c \=0A=
snprintf_chk.c sprintf_chk.c stpcpy_chk.c stpncpy_chk.c \=
=0A=
strcat_chk.c strcpy_chk.c strncat_chk.c strncpy_chk.c \=0A=
vsnprintf_chk.c vsprintf_chk.c=0A=
=0A=
.for i in ${SSP_SRCS}=0A=
SRCS+=3D${i}=0A=
WARNS.${i}=3D4=0A=
.endfor=0A=
=0A=
MAN+=3D ssp.3 __builtin_object_size.3=0A=
$=0A=
=0A=
Does it mean that that Makefile.inc from NetBSD tries to look for stuff nee=
ded in ssp/ directory when such directory does not exist in NetBSD src?=0A=
=0A=
BTW is there a way how to change mail address in bug report? I have it set =
to plain text, but still Outlook sending out crap and is bad for reading (f=
or anyone probably)=0A=
=0A=
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index