NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bin/51039: makemandb(8): Check for return value of chdir(2)
The following reply was made to PR bin/51039; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
er.abhinav.upadhyay%gmail.com@localhost
Subject: Re: bin/51039: makemandb(8): Check for return value of chdir(2)
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 18:51:25 +0200
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 03:05:01PM +0000, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR bin/51039; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Abhinav Upadhyay <er.abhinav.upadhyay%gmail.com@localhost>
> To: NetBSD GNATS <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
> Cc: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: bin/51039: makemandb(8): Check for return value of chdir(2)
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 20:33:32 +0530
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> > The following reply was made to PR bin/51039; it has been noted by GNATS.
> >
> > From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
> > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: bin/51039: makemandb(8): Check for return value of chdir(2)
> > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 14:56:09 +0200
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 12:10:00AM +0000, er.abhinav.upadhyay%gmail.com@localhost wrote:
> > > makemandb makes a call to chdir(2) before parsing each page but the
> > > return value of chdir is not checked. We should check the return status
> > > and handle the error.
> >
> > Actually, it would be better to just keep the parent directory open and
> > use fchdir.
> >
>
> You mean keeping a set of file descriptors open for each of the parent
> directories, so that instead of doing chdir each time, we use the
> already open fds for doing fchdir, and close the open fds once we are
> done doing all the parsing?
Sure, the hierachy is supposed to flat (i.e. two levels under man/ at
most), and you only need the directory open while parsing a file in that
subtree.
Joerg
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index