[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/50249 (XHCI driver missing delay after address set)
The following reply was made to PR kern/50249; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Sprow <webpages%sprow.co.uk@localhost>
Subject: Re: kern/50249 (XHCI driver missing delay after address set)
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:30:21 +0100
On 23 Sep, <skrll%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
> Active development of xhci is happening on the nick-nhusb branch which
> has the delay after address set already.
I've been following the branch with interest, but assumed the trunk was still
open to submissions since only the bold/brave would be using the experimental
version. Hence adding the SET_ADDRESS_SETTLE to the trunk benefits those
> The field rename is not required, imo.
My aim was to (try to) make the code clearer, because it's pretty opaque at
the moment. If I search the XHCI spec for "CS" I get false hits for the
command stop flag throughout the document (and the same register!) whereas
"RCS" is unique and describes what the variable holds.
Main Index |
Thread Index |