[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
The following reply was made to PR misc/50166; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
To: Robert Millan <rmh%gnu.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: misc/50166
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:56:39 +0200
Maybe we should even do something more radical and follow Plan9 completely
(in make) by eliminating all size limited path name buffers?
Should not be too hard, and conceptionally make has no purpose to know about
varying and arbitrary path limits.
P.S.: but I understand you are looking for a quick/interim solution to get
things going, that is fine too.
Main Index |
Thread Index |