Re: re: toolchain/49505: Relocate Lua documentation?

["Kamil Rytarowski" <n54%gmx.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR toolchain/49505; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Kamil Rytarowski" <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, marc%msys.ch@localhost, mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: re: toolchain/49505: Relocate Lua documentation?
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:01:48 +0100

 matthew green wrote:
 > Marc Balmer wrote
 >  > This is not a bug.  Lua can be used without the comp set installed.
 >  
 >  so.. why are they in section 3?
 >  
 >  either way, something is wrong -- section 3 does not belong
 >  in the man set, but the comp set.
 >  
 >  it sounds like lua docs belong in section 1.  eg, like awk.1
 >  and sed.1, etc.
 >  
 > 
 
 The current Lua documented functions don't cleanly match
 "general commands" (section 1).
 
 Lua man pages:
 
 gpio.3lua        gpio.close.3lua  gpio.open.3lua   gpio.set.3lua
 gpio.unset.3lua  intro.3lua       syslog.3lua      gpio.attach.3lua
 gpio.info.3lua   gpio.read.3lua   gpio.toggle.3lua gpio.write.3lua
 sqlite.3lua
 
 intro.9lua pmf.9lua   systm.9lua
 
 In my opinion they match section 3 (Library functions) and section
 9 (Kernel). as they are document ordinary API. All man pages section
 3 and 9 are in comp.
 
 If there is exception for Lua then OK, I was just wondering.