Re: bin/49485 (mandoc fails to fail if the word No appears unquoted in a reference)

[Antti Kantee <pooka%iki.fi@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR bin/49485; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Antti Kantee <pooka%iki.fi@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
 netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/49485 (mandoc fails to fail if the word No appears unquoted
 in a reference)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 23:39:12 +0000

 On 16/12/14 23:29, wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 > Synopsis: mandoc fails to fail if the word No appears unquoted in a reference
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > State-Changed-When: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 23:29:18 +0000
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > Thanks for the laugh!
 > (If you really care about the groff misbehaviour,
 > we can reopen that, but I don't expect it to be fixed
 > in NetBSD. It would be wiser to report it to groff upstream
 > instead.)
 
 I'm a bit confused when the same thing is described both as "Not a bug" 
 and "misbehaviour".
 
 The practical aspect I *am* interested in if it's mandated that manpages 
 should be tested to render properly with both mandoc and groff before 
 committing them.